|
|
|
The Gospel of LukeRead Luke 1-4. The opening chapter of the gospel of Luke tells the story of Mary, the mother of Jesus, and contains her famous song of joy that has traditionally been known as "The Magnificat." We read first that the angel Gabriel comes to Zechariah, a priest of the temple in Jerusalem, and promises him a son, to be named John, who "will be filled with the Holy Spirit." When Zechariah protests that he and Elizabeth are too old to conceive a child, Gabriel takes away his ability to speak until John is born and named. The story reminds us of the promise to Abraham and Sarah in Genesis, of their disbelief because of their old age, and of the hope that God's promises will be fulfilled. (Gen. 17:15-22) The story of Elizabeth's pregnancy prepares the way for the appearance of the angel Gabriel to Mary, who is engaged to Joseph, a descendant of the family of King David. Gabriel tells Mary that, although she is a virgin, she will conceive a son by the power of the Holy Spirit, and that her son "will be called Son of God." The angel informs Mary of Elizabeth's pregnancy to prove to her that "God's promises can never fail." So, Mary visits Elizabeth to see for herself. When Elizabeth hears Mary's greeting, her baby stirs in her womb. Then Elizabeth is "filled with the Holy Spirit" and exclaims, "God's blessing is on you above all women, and his blessing is on the fruit of your womb. Who am I, that the mother of my Lord should visit me?" Elizabeth proclaims that Mary will rejoice, because she "has had faith that the Lord's promise to her would be fulfilled!" As Abraham and Sarah trusted in the promise of God, so has Mary. Then Mary praises God, as her Lord and Savior, who "has routed the proud" and "filled the hungry with good things" but "sent the rich away empty." We notice immediately that the gospel of Luke has none of the reticence about using the word "God" that marked the gospel of Matthew. This is additional evidence that the gospel of Luke was written for Gentiles and for Jewish Christians who were at home in Greek culture.
The second chapter relates the journey of Mary and Joseph to Bethlehem and the visit of the shepherds to the stable where Jesus is born. Joseph and Mary are forced to travel to Bethlehem because of a census decreed by the Roman Emperor that requires each family to return to its traditional home. Those who are familiar with the Christmas story will now realize that part of the story is in the gospel of Luke and part is in the gospel of Matthew. The two stories are independent of each other and differ in details. For instance, in the gospel of Luke the shepherds visit Jesus at a stable and we are told that Jesus has been laid "in a manger," but in the gospel of Matthew the wise men enter a house to bring their gifts to him. In the life of the church, however, these two stories have been combined into the familiar Christmas story. There are factual difficulties with the dating of this account. Herod the Great ruled during the years 37 B.C. to 4 A.D. Quirinius was governor of Syria in 6-7 A.D. As their reigns do not overlap, the assertion by the gospel of Luke that both were ruling during the time of the census cannot be true. Moreover, there is no historical record of this census in Palestine. Very likely the author of the gospel uses a census as a reason for Joseph and Mary to travel from Nazareth to Bethlehem, so the birth of Jesus will fulfill the prophecy in Micah (5:2) about a king being born in Bethlehem. We misunderstand the purpose of the gospel of Luke if we read it as a factual account of the life, ministry, and death of Jesus. It has the form of a biography, but it is a testimony to the good news proclaimed by the early church. The gospel of Luke relates that the parents of Jesus follow the commandments of Jewish law by bringing Jesus to the temple for circumcision eight days after his birth. They make an offering of two turtledoves or two pigeons, in keeping with the law of Moses (Leviticus 12:2-8), so that Mary can be judged clean by a temple priest after her bleeding during childbirth. (The gospel does not say that the couple paid a fee for their firstborn son, as is required in Numbers 3:47-48.) Those who are familiar with Jewish law will realize at once that Joseph and Mary are poor, because they can not afford to sacrifice a ram and a bird but instead have to purchase and sacrifice two birds. The story not only affirms that Jesus was circumcised but also that the parents who raised him were simple people.
In the temple two witnesses attest to the destiny of Jesus. Simeon, "an upright and devout" man "who watched and waited for the restoration of Israel," is moved by the Holy Spirit to proclaim that Jesus is the Messiah. The words of Simeon are taken from three passages in Isaiah (52:10, 42:6, and 49:6) and make it clear that the Messiah has not only come to save Israel but "the Gentiles" as well. Furthermore, Anna, who is described as a prophetess, also gives thanks to God and testifies "to all who were looking for the liberation of Jerusalem." The shared leadership in the church of men and women is reflected in these two stories of recognition. Then the gospel of Luke relates the only story of Jesus as a youth that is included in the gospels of the New Testament. When he is twelve years old, Jesus remains behind in Jerusalem after his parents have left for Nazareth and amazes the teachers in the temple with his intelligence and wisdom. When Mary chastises Jesus for worrying her and his father, he answers: "Did you not know that I was bound to be in my Father's house?" The gospel notes that his parents do not understand his reply, but "his mother treasured up all these things in her heart." We are not surprised to hear that as Jesus grows older, "he advanced in wisdom and in favor with God and men." The third chapter of the gospel of Luke begins with details about the Roman and Jewish rulers of the day. Herod is Herod Antipas, the son of Herod the Great. The year is probably 28 or 29 A.D. The phrase, "the word of God came to John," identifies John as a prophet like Isaiah (38:3) and Jeremiah (1:1). This confirms an earlier statement in Luke 1:76, and later in Luke 7:26 the gospel will again refer to John as a prophet. The report about John the Baptist in the gospel of Luke is very similar to that in the gospel of Matthew, which suggests that the two gospel writers are using the same source for their story. But the gospel of Luke relates that John is arrested before the baptism of Jesus. This not only contradicts the other gospels but the summary of these events in Acts 1:21-22, which is written by the same author!
This change in the sequence of events means that John does not baptize Jesus. The gospel of Luke records that the Holy Spirit descends on Jesus, like a dove during "a general baptism of the people." It appears that the author of the gospel of Luke wants to minimize the role of John the Baptist in the story of Jesus. When we discover in the Acts of the Apostles that disciples of John the Baptist are competing with the apostles of Jesus for followers after the resurrection, perhaps the desire of the author of the gospel of Luke and Acts to reduce the role of John in the gospel story will make more sense. In the gospel of Luke John says the one coming after him will baptize "with the Holy Spirit and with fire." In the gospel of Mark John says the one coming after him will baptize "with the Holy Spirit," but the gospel of Matthew has the same statement as the gospel of Luke. We will see in other places that the gospel of Luke and the gospel of Matthew often make the same change to the text of the gospel of Mark. This suggests that they are each using additional material, as they rewrite the gospel of Mark to create their own gospel accounts. In the Acts of the Apostles, the sequel to the gospel of Luke, the author describes how the coming of the Holy Spirit is accompanied by fire. The third chapter of the gospel of Luke concludes with a genealogy that traces the lineage of Jesus (who is now about thirty years old, we are told) all the way back to Adam, the "son of God." The emphasis here is not on the Jewish ancestry of Jesus, as in the gospel of Matthew, but on the relationship between Jesus and all humanity descended from Adam. A close comparison of these accounts in the gospels of Matthew and Luke reveals discrepancies, which again make it clear that the New Testament is not intended to be read as the literal or inerrant word of God. If the early church had intended the gospels to be read as historical reports, it would have combined the four gospels into one authorized version of the history of Jesus and edited out the factual contradictions. By including in the New Testament four gospel accounts, each of which differs in some respects from the others, the church affirmed a plurality of witnesses to the good news.
Because of stories in the gospels of Mark and Matthew, we have become accustomed to thinking that Jesus is rejected by his family and his synagogue. Yet, the gospel of Mark admits at the end that his mother was with him during his ministry in Galilee. Moreover, his mother is present at his crucifixion in all four gospels, and Acts reports (1:14) that his mother and "his brothers" gather with the disciples and the women who have followed Jesus in the upper room in Jerusalem to await his return. Other Jews from Galilee, including his disciples, choose to follow him. Perhaps the stories of his rejection at home are meant to illustrate the rejection of Jesus by the Jews who resist the teachings of Jewish Christians. It may also be that the story of the rejection of Jesus in Nazareth by his synagogue represents the struggle between Paul (and other ministers among the Gentiles) and the Jewish Christian leadership in Jerusalem. After all, Paul was rejected by "his people" and by the synagogues he visited on his travels. Might not the violent reaction of the synagogue in Nazareth to the teaching of Jesus simply reflect the treatment that Paul (and presumably others) encountered in spreading the gospel throughout the cities of the Roman Empire? In the gospels attributed to Mark, Matthew and Luke, the descent of the Holy Spirit upon Jesus at his baptism is the beginning of his ministry. In the gospel of Luke the presence of the Spirit in Jesus is often noted, perhaps to explain his extraordinary power. We may recall from 1 Cor. 15:12-19 that Paul emphasizes the resurrection as confirming that Jesus is the Christ. Because in Colossians Paul argues that Jesus Christ was with God in the very beginning of creation, (Col. 1:13-20) it may be that this letter was written after Paul's death but in his name by someone else. The story of the baptism of Jesus, however, suggests an understanding that Jesus was the Christ because he was full of the Spirit of God. This seems to be why the voice from heaven accompanying the descent of the Holy Spirit says, "You are my beloved Son."
From Nazareth Jesus goes to Capernaum, teaches in the synagogue on the sabbath, and casts out of a man the demon which has identified Jesus as "the Holy One of God." The gospel is now following the account of the gospel of Mark. (The author of the gospel of Luke uses about half of the material in the gospel of Mark in his own account.) Jesus heals Simon's mother-in-law of a high fever, heals many others, and forbids evil spirits, who know his identity, to speak. But the word gets out anyway, and the gospel reports that Jesus is "the talk of the whole district."
Questions: 1. Why do you think the author of the gospel of Luke tells the stories of Elizabeth and Mary? Are these stories important for your faith? 2. Why do you think the author of the gospel of Luke might want to conceal the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist? What does the baptism of Jesus mean to you? 3. Are you surprised that Jesus begins his ministry in the gospel of Luke by reading from Isaiah in the synagogue in Nazareth? How does he begin his ministry in the gospel of Mark and in the gospel of Matthew? |
|
Home Exegesis Scripture Worship Ethics Dialogue Parables Email
1 in Faith: A Christian Bible Study † Copyright © 2000 by Robert Traer |